Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
    • Journal home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Online First
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • Access for GSL Fellows
    • Access for other member types
    • Press office
    • Help
  • Alerts
    • eTOC alerts
    • Online First alerts
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
    • GSL blog
  • Submit
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Scottish Journal of Geology
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
  • Follow gsl on Twitter
  • Visit gsl on Facebook
  • Visit gsl on Youtube
  • Visit gsl on Linkedin
Scottish Journal of Geology

Advanced search

  • Home
    • Journal home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Online First
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • Access for GSL Fellows
    • Access for other member types
    • Press office
    • Help
  • Alerts
    • eTOC alerts
    • Online First alerts
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
    • GSL blog
  • Submit

Late Castlemainian (Ca 4, Arenig) graptolites from the Ballantrae Complex, SW Scotland

Jörg Maletz
Scottish Journal of Geology, 40, 185-186, 1 November 2004, https://doi.org/10.1144/sjg40020185
Jörg Maletz
Department of Geology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14260-3050, USA email:jorgm@aesu.buffalo.edu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Sirs — Graptolites of Arenig age have been discussed repeatedly from the Ballantrae Complex (Stone & Strachan 1981; Stone & Rushton 1983, 2003; Rushton et al. 1986; Rushton & Stone 1988). The inferred bios-tratigraphic ranges were estimated to be from the basal Arenig Tetragraptus approximatus Biozone to the early Yapeenian. As the exact dating of the graptolite faunas in this sequence has some important implications for the interpretation of the tectonic development of the region, precision is relevant to the question.

The discovery of Arenig isograptid faunas in the North Ballaird borehole (Stone & Strachan 1981; Stone & Rushton 2003) thus was of crucial importance for the determination of the timing of the collisional event initiating the Grampian Orogeny. Stone & Rushton (2003) described the fauna in detail and discussed a possible early Yapeenian age, but were not able to exclude a late Castlemainian (Ca 4) age. The fauna represent the best preserved and richest isograptid fauna found so far in Britain. British isograptids in general are poorly known from few scattered records (Jenkins 1982) and their use for a detailed biostratigraphy was limited due to tectonic distortion and ambiguous identifications.

Isograptid faunal successions are well established from Australasia (Cooper 1973; Cooper & Ni 1986) and eastern North America (Williams & Stevens 1988). Their taxonomy and evolution is known in great detail (Maletz & Mitchell 1996; Maletz & Zhang 2003). Therefore, they are regarded as of high potential for biostratigraphic purposes and inter-continental correlation (Maletz et al. 2003). The illustrations by Stone & Rushton (2003) to support their interpretation of a Yapeenian age of the fauna are excellent and show the material to be well preserved. Therefore a detailed assessment of the fauna is possible.

Faunal remarks

Specimens identified as Isograptus caduceus australis Cooper (Stone & Rushton 2003, fig. 7) show the typical shape of an isograptid of the Parisograptus caduceus group (see Maletz & Zhang 2003) with V-shaped to U-shaped rhabdosome and variably reclined to scandent and even parallel-sided stipes. The deep indentation invariably present in all specimens between the sicula and th 11 indicates that the specimens should be identified as Parisograptus imitatus (Harris). P. caduceus australis (Cooper) shows a very short indentation between sicula and th 11 and a distinctly shorter supradorsal part of the sicula (Cooper 1973, text-fig. 16). P. imitatus is common in the Ca 4, but does not reach the Yapeenian (Cooper 1973), whereas P. caduceus australis (Cooper) appears to be confined to the Yapeenian. However, this species has been identified without doubt only from Australasia so far. Williams & Stevens (1988) described a number of different species under the name P. caduceus australis. The Newfoundland succession is currently under revision (see Maletz et al. 2003) and the preliminary results show that P. caduceus australis is not represented.

Specimens referred to the Isograptus victoriae group by Stone & Rushton (2003, fig. 8a-d) are poorly preserved. They clearly show the distal widening of the stipes typical for the younger members of the Isograptus victoriae group and may belong to I. v. maximus.

A serious problem is set by the identification of Isograptus gibberulus. The type material (Rushton 2000) shows it to be a slender member of the Isograptus victoriae group, even though it was referred to the P. caduceus group by Jenkins (1982). The species comes from the Didymograptus hirundo Biozone, a rather long time interval, subdivided in Scandinavia into a number of shorter intervals (Maletz 2004). The species was described from the Bogo Shale of Norway (Schmidt-Giindel 1994), but does not appear to be widely distributed or recognized outside Britain.

Stone & Rushton (2003) figured a few pseudisograptid specimens as Arienigraptus gracilis. They show the relatively simple thecal style of Arienigraptus, but a high manubrium and an extremely long sicula. The specimens are here referred to the late Castlemainian (Ca 4) species Pseudisograptus initialis (Maletz 2001).

The genus Maeandrograptus makes a surprising appearance in the Ballantrae Complex. The specimen was described as Tylograptus sp., but the thecal style of the specimen clearly indicates its relationship to Maeandrograptus. Maeandrograptus is known from a number of species in Scandinavia (M. schmalenseei, M. mobergi, M. leptograptoides: Skevington 1965). They show a highly variable stipe width and thecal overlap. In M. leptograptoides the thecal overlap increases distinctly distally (Monsen 1937), and it does so even more in the Ballantrae Maeandrograptus. Similarities can be seen to material described as Paradidymograptus by Wang (1975) from China, here also referred to Maeandrograptus. Wang's material shows a strong widening of the stipes along the first few thecae, similar to the specimen figured by Stone & Rushton (2003). Prothecal folds are common in Maeandrograptus, but the expression of these is variable. A relationship of the Ballantrae specimen to the Darriwilian (Da 1 - Da 3) genus Tvlograptus (?syn. of Holmograptus) cannot be supported. Tylograptus shows a much more complex thecal style with genicular and apertural elaboration, as well as very characteristic shape of prothecal folds (Zhang & Fortey 2001).

Yutagraptusl v-defiexus was indicated to be restricted to the Yapeenian and early Darriwilian by Vandenberg & Cooper (1992). However, the species is common in the Isograptus victoriae maximodivergens Biozone of western Newfoundland (Williams & Stevens 1988: identified as Xiphogrciptus declinatus), extending its range downwards. Thus, it cannot be taken as in indication of a Yapeenian age. The species ranges into the Darriwilian Undulograptus austrodentatus Biozone at least, as it was found in the Bogo Shale of the Trondheim region, Norway (Schmidt-Gündel 1994).

The age

The revision of the faunas described by Stone & Rushton (2003) indicates that all faunal elements are consistent with a Ca 4 age. Main faunal elements of the Yapeenian as Pseudisograptus manubriatus group, ExigraptuslApiograptus and Oncograptus/Cardiograptus (see Vandenberg & Cooper 1992) are not present and the common isograptids can be referred to typical Castle- mainian forms. The presence of Pseudisograptus initialis in the fauna may indicate the usefulness of this species to identify the latest Castlemainian. Maeandrograptus is found in Scandinavia from the late Bendigonian to the late Castlemainian, with the typical Maeandrograptus schmalenseei now referred to the Ca 3 (Maletz 2004). The presence of Maeandrograptus supports the age determination, especially as the Holmograptus group (including Tylograptus) only appears with Holmograptus bovis in the early Darriwilian Undulograptus austrodentatus Biozone (Maletz 1997; Williams & Stevens 1988).

  • © 2004 Scottish Journal of Geology

References

  1. ↵
    1. COOPER R. A.
    1973. Taxonomy and evolution of Isograptus Moberg in Australasia. Palaeontology, 16, 45–115.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. COOPER R. A.,
    2. NI Y.
    1986. Taxonomy, phylogeny, and variability of Pseudisograptus Beavis. Palaeontology, 29, 313–363.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. JENKINS C. J.
    1982. Isograptus gibberulus (Nicholson) and the isograptids of the Arenig Series (Ordovician) of England and Wales. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 44, 219–248.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. MALETZ J.
    1997. Arenig Biostratigraphy of the Pointe-de- Lévy slice, QuÉbec Appalachians, Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 34, 733–752.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  5. ↵
    1. MALETZ J.
    2001. A condensed Lower to Middle Ordovician graptolite succession at Matane (Québec, Canada). Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 38, 1531–1539.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. MALETZ J.
    in press. Early Middle Ordovician graptolite biostratigraphy of the Lovisefred and Albjâra wells (Scania, southern Sweden). Palaeontology.
  6. ↵
    1. MALETZ J.,
    2. MITCHELL C. E.
    1996. Evolution and phylogenetic classification of the Glossograptidae and Arienigraptidae (Graptoloidea): New data and remaining questions. Journal of Paleontology, 70, 641–655.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  7. ↵
    1. MALETZ J.,
    2. ZHANG Y. D.
    2003. The proximal structure and development in the Ordovician graptolite Parisograptus Chen and Zhang, 1996. Palaeontology, 46, 295–306.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. MALETZ J.,
    2. MITCHELL C. E.,
    3. MELCHIN M. J.,
    4. DUNLAVEY T.
    2003. Revision of the Castlemanian isograptid (graptolite) biostratigraphy in western Newfoundland. In Ortega, G. & Acenolaza, G. F. (eds.) Proceedings 7th IGC-FMSS. Serie Correlacion Geologica, 18, INSUEGEO, 55–60.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. MONSEN A.
    1937. Die Graptolithenfauna im Unteren Didymograptus Schiefer (Phyllograptusschiefer) Norwegens. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, 16, 57–263.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. RUSHTON A. W. A.,
    2. STONE P.
    1988. Graptolite faunas from the Ballantrae Complex. Scottish Journal of Geologv, 24, 93–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. RUSHTON A. W. A.,
    2. STONE P.,
    3. SMELLIE J. L.,
    4. TUNNICLIFF S. P.
    1986. An early Arenig age for the Pinbain sequence of the Ballantrae Complex. Scottish Journal of Geology, 22, 41–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. SCHMIDT-GüNDEL O.
    1994. Die Unterordovizischen Graptolithenfaunen des Bogo- und Lo- Schiefers (Sor- Trondelag, West-Norwegen). Unpublished PhD thesis, TU Berlin, Germany.
  13. ↵
    1. SKEVINGTON D.
    1965. Graptolites from the Ontikan limestones (Ordovician) of öland, Sweden. 2. Graptoloidea and Graptovermida. Bulletin of the Geological Institute of the University of Upsala, 43, 1–74.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. STONE P.,
    2. RUSHTON A. W. A.
    1983. Graptolite faunas from the Ballantrae ophiolite complex and their structural implications. Scottish Journal of Geologv, 19, 297–310.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. STONE P.,
    2. RUSHTON A. W. A.
    2003. A late Arenig (early Yapeenian) graptolite fauna and the coeval tectonic development of the Ballantrae Complex ophiolite, SW Scotland. Scottish Journal of Geologv, 39, 29–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. STONE P.,
    2. STRACHAN I.
    1981. A fossiliferous borehole section within the Ballantrae ophiolite. Nature, 293, 455–457.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. VANDENBERG A. H. M.,
    2. COOPER R. A.
    1992. The Ordovician graptolite sequence of Australasia. Alcheringa, 16, 33–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. WANG X. F.
    1975. On the classification and evolution of Paradidymograptus and Nicholsonograptus. Acta Geologica Sinica, 1975, 6–13.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. WILLIAMS S. H.,
    2. STEVENS R. K.
    1988. Early Ordovician (Arenig) graptolites of the Cow Head Group, western Newfoundland, Canada. Palaeontographica Canadiana, 5, 1–167.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. ZHANG Y. D.,
    2. FORTEY R. A.
    2001. The proximal development and thecal structure of the Ordovician graptolites Tylograptus and Sinograptus. Palaeontology, 44, 553–573.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Scottish Journal of Geology
Volume 40, Issue 2
November 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation tools

Late Castlemainian (Ca 4, Arenig) graptolites from the Ballantrae Complex, SW Scotland

Jörg Maletz
Scottish Journal of Geology, 40, 185-186, 1 November 2004, https://doi.org/10.1144/sjg40020185
Jörg Maletz
Department of Geology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14260-3050, USA email:jorgm@aesu.buffalo.edu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions
View PDF
Share

Late Castlemainian (Ca 4, Arenig) graptolites from the Ballantrae Complex, SW Scotland

Jörg Maletz
Scottish Journal of Geology, 40, 185-186, 1 November 2004, https://doi.org/10.1144/sjg40020185
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Email to

Thank you for sharing this Scottish Journal of Geology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Late Castlemainian (Ca 4, Arenig) graptolites from the Ballantrae Complex, SW Scotland
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Scottish Journal of Geology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Scottish Journal of Geology.
Print
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Faunal remarks
    • The age
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Similar Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Reply to discussion
  • Rock slope failure and debris flow, Gleann na Guiserein, Knoydart: Comment
Show more: Letters to the Editors
  • Most read
  • Most cited
Loading
  • A sauropod-dominated tracksite from Rubha nam Brathairean (Brothers’ Point), Isle of Skye, Scotland
  • Discussion of ‘The Highland Boundary Fault and the Highland Border Complex’ by B. J. Bluck, Scottish Journal of Geology, 46, 113–124
  • Reply to the discussion by Tanner on ‘The Highland Boundary Fault and the Highland Border Complex’ Bluck (2010) Scottish Journal of Geology, 46, 113–124
  • Book Review
  • Introducing Geomorphology: A Guide to Landforms and Processes
More...

Scottish Journal of Geology

  • About the journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Author information
  • Supplementary Publications
  • Subscribe
  • Pay per view
  • Alerts & RSS
  • Copyright & Permissions
  • Activate Online Subscription
  • Feedback
  • Help

Lyell Collection

  • About the Lyell Collection
  • Lyell Collection homepage
  • Collections
  • Open Access Collection
  • Open Access Policy
  • Lyell Collection access help
  • Recommend to your Library
  • Lyell Collection Sponsors
  • MARC records
  • Digital preservation
  • Developing countries
  • Geofacets
  • Manage your account
  • Cookies

The Geological Society

  • About the Society
  • Join the Society
  • Benefits for Members
  • Online Bookshop
  • Publishing policies
  • Awards, Grants & Bursaries
  • Education & Careers
  • Events
  • Geoscientist Online
  • Library & Information Services
  • Policy & Media
  • Society blog
  • Contact the Society

 

EGS logo

 

 

Published by The Geological Society of London, registered charity number 210161

Print ISSN 
0036-9276
Online ISSN 
2041-4951

Copyright © 2019 Scottish Journal of Geology